remember an odd little message on spider bridge written in white: choke me. some folks like to be choked. it thrills them. some choke themselves with belts suspended on shower rods i read, for sexual thrills, and sometimes it goes too far. damn, it's not worth dying for, and i can't imagine such a strong shower rod. but i was thinking again about the choke collar for dogs, which is about hurt and control but i do not doubt for some sexual pleasure, and i do not doubt the use of the choke prong dog collar between consenting humans. the dog is not consenting, no doubt about it. people i thought do like to choke. mostly the other though. the police i am sure though it probably wasn't mentioned, get a sexual thrill when they choke someone to death saying i can't breathe. better the victim than me their primitive brains say. but that's primitive in a highly advanced technological society, which means lost and depraved, in this case, as so many others. so i was thinking again about the black trumpsman, and any trumpsfolk, who elect a man that would choke them to death for the thrill. umm, you may think he's crazy, that's crazy, what a sick world, and you would be soul right.
waddya think the bond is between a person and a dog in a barbed choke collar who is continually being yanked by the hand that holds their very life? that shows them without respite that any move deemed untoward will bring pain, that needs control and needs their pain to control them. would their bond be one of love or hate? would the dog be confused by the concept? and now i have a waft of jamais vu but that's ok it bears repeating on a different day. all this bring me to the black trumpsman again, or anyone who would choose a sick fuck like trump. do they want the pain? do they want the pain a dog would never choose? or do they imagine they will always be the one to hold the leash, even if it's their own?