and i'm the one she calls hostile i reckon. if you refute 

her rhetoric you are negative. if you counter propaganda 

with truth, you're hostile. i feel the blowback

from her letter is what she intends,

she provokes then takes the high ground 

and her agenda condescends, 

when you give impassioned reply.

it's not worth the upset. is it? it is 

when you step away.

and i just hope all this means we are not such a minor disturbance 

in the path of their progress. 

i thought i would just reply to that last letter of hers on the blog, 

but that would be giving credence even unread.

i was thinking i need to detach 
from the battle to continue in the struggle.
strive for sanity. 
cause while we battle the players are playing
their wage war.
we are faced with living 
in an obamaland within a trumpworld, 
and we need to find our own character 
and seek our own characteristic good.
we have to live in this world, come what may.
but there is another world in this one,
as someone says.