the other day r. said my eyes and lulu's had the same expression, did i mirror her? and i said i couldn't see her eyes til i saw the pictures, but in fact we had the same expression. this time i was following her gaze and watching the po-po pull up, and then a flock of seagulls, and then just playing around. 

i put aside seeing silence but i'll circle back to see if it flows better. the type is too small and that makes my mind anxious and r. said it's a type for younger readers, i mean younger eyes, she said, and maybe, i read more dense stuff earlier but now i crave flow and simplicity, and i never liked small type, and i don't read large type either, there's a just right range (not rage) i know, like when i hung work i put it not just at my height but where people of various size eyes could feel relative comfort. 

no news today i think. the sun was coming from the east and the west was dark now the two have merged. 

i thought maybe i'm too slow for seeing silence but the things he's talking about are experiential and i thought it would be better if he dispensed with the layers of dead philosophers and made the writing like the silence and light that are the subject. subjective, i know. it's hard to make light or silence in words.

and second place is much better type and short but not simple, it's thinking and not seeking favor. it's not insisting on explaining, and after a few rachel cusk books i think i'm getting her somewhat.