Basically Bret Stephens could have made his op-ed one line: Palestinians are not human so it can't be genocide. He's not a journalist, he's a propagandist. Boycott The New York Times war crimes.

                                               ++++ 

History has no patience for those who enable atrocities under the guise of journalism. Bret Stephens isn’t offering analysis—he’s laundering genocide. He’s twisting definitions, ignoring international law, and erasing the lived reality of Palestinians to shield a government from accountability. But genocide doesn’t require his approval to be real. The mass graves are real. The starvation is real. The charred bodies of children are real. The destroyed hospitals are real. The destroyed mosques are real. The destroyed churches are real. And no amount of New York Times OpEd spin can wash the oceans of Palestinian blood from this truth. The New York Times once downplayed the Holocaust. Today, they’re repeating that shameful legacy in real time. And just like then, silence is complicity. So yes, Bret Stephens, whether you want to face facts or not, the Israeli government is committing genocide of the Palestinian people. And rather than serve as water carriers for war criminals, you should serve as an actual representative of the Fourth Estate and hold the powerful accountable. But the choice is yours to stay on the wrong side of history, or join humanity on the right side. None the less, I’ll close with this final point that Bret Stephens should remember: Nuremberg didn’t only try those who dropped the bombs—but also those who justified them.

             Qasim Rashid