Do you condemn Hamas? And do you support Obama's right to colonize the park? No, and No.

Let's just start with two questions. Do you condemn Hamas, and do you accept Israel's right to exist. No and no. Ok, that's a rap.

 

We just watched The Rebellion. I won't tell the tale but the moral is the government will use you, lock you up or kill you, and the only way to rebel is to become a heathen and die and go to hell.

 

 we went to see trudy. she asked why she can't remember stuff without much affect but she remembered us and ate seven cherries and some cheese cubes and orange wedges and went to sleep and we left as a storm blasted through and drenched the kitchen and dining room.

 

Our gargoyles couldn't ward off the evil Obamachron but they're cool.

Dogs Against Genocide

The New York Times is an accomplice to the genocide in Gaza, serving as a mouthpiece for American imperialism and shaping elite consensus around foreign policy. Times editors have told reporters to avoid “inflammatory terms” like “genocide,” “ethnic cleansing,” and “occupied territory” — and even to avoid saying “Palestine.” Headline writers have manipulated the English language and deployed tricks of syntax to obscure the U.S. and Israel’s perpetration of atrocities and blame Palestinians for their own oppression. Reporters have printed the Israeli military’s lies.

The Times’ commitment to Zionism is systemic and generational. For decades, critics of U.S. foreign policy have offered crucial analyses of the paper’s bias. This dossier borrows from and adds to that body of criticism by exposing the material and ideological ties to occupation and apartheid held by many high-ranking editors, journalists, and executive officers at the Times. The employees included in this dossier are individually as well as structurally incentivized to run cover for war criminals. That these individuals are empowered to frame the discourse around Israel’s genocide is an indictment of the entire institution of The New York Times.

Such an indictment demands a public response. Journalistic malpractice enables the weapons shipments that sustain the war on Gaza. The mass slaughter of a besieged people must be named for what it is: a genocide. The New York Times must be held accountable for its complicity. We continue to call on readers of the Times and members of the public to boycott, divest, and unsubscribe from the paper of criminal record. 

W.A.W.O.G.

Cancel subscription to New York Times. They will offer a deep discount. They insult our intelligence and our integrity. Refuse. 

Dogs Against Genocide

 

 My song of the day, Fables of Faubus, just popped into my head on my Lulu walk, but I heard Fables of Trumpus. The names change but the killer crooks keep coming. People dream of the summer of love, but it's bleeding love.